<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saber Rattling</title>
	<atom:link href="https://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221</link>
	<description>Defective Reflection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom</title>
		<link>https://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, is there someone who doesn&#039;t think your words and actions agree, or is this the whole Rom. I don&#039;t do what I know to do - I do what I know I shouldn&#039;t do conflict of flesh against spirit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is there someone who doesn&#8217;t think your words and actions agree, or is this the whole Rom. I don&#8217;t do what I know to do &#8211; I do what I know I shouldn&#8217;t do conflict of flesh against spirit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JA Menter 3</title>
		<link>https://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JA Menter 3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this isn&#039;t about here. I understand perfectly that no response isn&#039;t always a bad thing.  I&#039;m refering to face-to-face conversations or those similar to that. In blogging, I never expect a response and that would not sway me one way or the other in terms of content, as even now, I have about 6 topics piling up on me to blog about eventually.  However, the perceived compromise of my integrity is not related, even, to the silent response in a face-to-face conversation, yet it is something I know to be very real, though I do not believe my integrity has been compromised at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this isn&#8217;t about here. I understand perfectly that no response isn&#8217;t always a bad thing.  I&#8217;m refering to face-to-face conversations or those similar to that. In blogging, I never expect a response and that would not sway me one way or the other in terms of content, as even now, I have about 6 topics piling up on me to blog about eventually.  However, the perceived compromise of my integrity is not related, even, to the silent response in a face-to-face conversation, yet it is something I know to be very real, though I do not believe my integrity has been compromised at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom</title>
		<link>https://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defectivereflection.menterz.com/?p=221#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silence in response to a blog?  Or silence face to face?  Face to face a little &quot;What do YOU think?&quot; could go a long way.  On here I&#039;m not sure the remarks are always perceived as a conversation and thus perhaps not always responded to. I don&#039;t think a lack of response should be interpreted as a compromise of your integrity. You say what you think.  If you didn&#039;t THAT would be a compromise of your integrity, not not saying what will illicit a response. If you want thoughts about a specific thing from a specific person, bring up the topic again to that specific person.  Don&#039;t assume anything. Silence can be golden, or contemplative, or confused, or any of a number of other things.  Sometimes dialoging is just hard, like running through a mud hole, You have to just keep going.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silence in response to a blog?  Or silence face to face?  Face to face a little &#8220;What do YOU think?&#8221; could go a long way.  On here I&#8217;m not sure the remarks are always perceived as a conversation and thus perhaps not always responded to. I don&#8217;t think a lack of response should be interpreted as a compromise of your integrity. You say what you think.  If you didn&#8217;t THAT would be a compromise of your integrity, not not saying what will illicit a response. If you want thoughts about a specific thing from a specific person, bring up the topic again to that specific person.  Don&#8217;t assume anything. Silence can be golden, or contemplative, or confused, or any of a number of other things.  Sometimes dialoging is just hard, like running through a mud hole, You have to just keep going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
